A Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP Publication
TIP Home Current Issue About Us Email Alerts Archive Contact Us Seminars
  Printer Friendly Version
Considerations For Employers When Military Leaves Run Long
By Afi Johnson-Parris
April 2007

The U.S. military's ongoing role in global engagements has meant longer stays on active duty for civilian soldiers in the National Guard and Reserves.  Longer absences impact not only families but also employers, who may find that an employee has been gone for so long that the workplace looks much different when the employee returns than it did when the leave began.

Re-employment of military personnel is not always legally mandated by USERRA.  The law recognizes that business realities may intervene.  Each situation requires a careful look.

The Uniformed Services Employment & Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), 38 U.S.C. 4301, et seq., provides broad protection against discrimination and retaliation and gives returning service members rights to reemployment and reinstatement of health benefits.  Given the difficulties that can arise when someone returns after a lengthy leave, however, it is important to understand not only what is required but also what is not.

  • Reemployment is not required if it would be impossible or unreasonable due to changed circumstances.  The law does not draw precise lines to define what is impossible or unreasonable or what is an excusable changed circumstance.  Generally, such changes must be fundamental to the business and the employer must be prepared to show that the business has changed so much that the employee would not have the job today even if he or she had not taken leave.
  • Reemployment is also not required if the employee is no longer qualified due to a disability and cannot, with reasonable accommodation, become qualified.  As with the Americans with Disabilities Act, proving that someone is not qualified or is disabled can be tricky, but USERRA at least recognizes the idea that not everyone remains qualified for a particular job.
  • Employers are not required to maintain positions that were intended to be temporary and, consequently, are not available when the employee's leave ends.  Relying on this narrow exception, however, is difficult without evidence that the employee understood before taking leave that the job was temporary.



TIP Home Current Issue About Us Email Alerts Archive Contact Us Seminars

© 2012 Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission from Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP. The Inside Perspective is a publication and a service mark of Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP. The information in this The Inside Perspective Newsletter or on this website should not be interpreted as legal advice with respect to specific situations.